Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Heidegger on Concepts, Freedom and Normativity
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
January 2014
Print publication year:
2014
Online ISBN:
9781139382731
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139382731
Subjects:
History of Philosophy, Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Philosophy
Series:
Modern European Philosophy
Information

Book description

This book offers a fundamentally new account of the arguments and concepts which define Heidegger's early philosophy, and locates them in relation to both contemporary analytic philosophy and the history of philosophy. Drawing on recent work in the philosophy of mind and on Heidegger's lectures on Plato and Kant, Sacha Golob argues against existing treatments of Heidegger on intentionality and suggests that Heidegger endorses a unique position with respect to conceptual and representational content; he also examines the implications of this for Heidegger's views on truth, realism and 'being'. He goes on to explore Heidegger's work on the underlying issue of normativity, and focuses on his theory of freedom, arguing that it is freedom that links the existential concerns of Being and Time to concepts such as reason, perfection and obligation. His book offers a distinctive new perspective for students of Heidegger and the history of twentieth-century philosophy.

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
  • 2 - Ontology and propositional intentionality
    pp 48-69
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation
References

References

Allais, L. (2009), ‘Kant, Non-Conceptual Content and the Representation of Space’, Journal of the History of Philosophy, 47: 383–413.
Allison, H. (1990), Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Allison, H. (1996), Idealism and Freedom. Cambridge University Press.
Allison, H. (2004), Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. London: Yale University Press.
Ameriks, K. (2000), Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press.
Ameriks, K. (2003), Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bambach, C. (2003), Heidegger’s Roots. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Blattner, W. (1995), ‘Decontextualization, Standardization and Deweyan Science’, Man and World, 28: 321–39.
Blattner, W. (1999), Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
Blattner, W. (2004), ‘Heidegger’s Kantian Idealism Revisited’, Inquiry, 47: 321–37.
Blattner, W. (2007), ‘Ontology, the a Priori and the Primacy of Practice’, in Malpas, J. and Crowell, S. (eds.) Transcendental Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
Bradley, F. H. (1911), ‘Reply to Mr Russell’s Explanations’, Mind, 20: 74–6.
Brandom, R. (2000), Articulating Reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Blattner, W. (2002), ‘Dasein, the Being That Thematizes’, in Dreyfus, H. and Wrathall, M. (eds.) Heidegger Reexamined. New York: Routledge.
Blattner, W. (2005), ‘Heidegger’s Categories in Being and Time’, in Dreyfus, H. and Wrathall, M. (eds.) A Companion to Heidegger. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blattner, W. (2010), ‘Reply to Gibbard’, in Weiss, B. and Wanderer, J. (eds.) Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. Abingdon: Routledge.
Brentano, F. (1973), Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Brewer, B. (2006), ‘Perception and Content’, European Journal of Philosophy, 14: 165–81.
Brewer, B. (2011), Perception and Its Objects. Oxford University Press.
Byrne, A. (2001), ‘Intentionalism Defended’, Philosophical Review, 110: 199–240.
Campbell, J. (2002), Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Carman, T. (2002), ‘Was Heidegger a Linguistic Idealist?’, Inquiry, 45: 205–15.
Carman, T. (2003), Heidegger’s Analytic. Cambridge University Press.
Blattner, W. (2005), ‘Authenticity’, in Dreyfus, H. and Wrathall, M. (eds.) A Companion to Heidegger. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blattner, W. (2008), Merleau-Ponty. Abingdon: Routledge.
Cassam, Q. (1999), ‘Self-Directed Transcendental Arguments’, in Stern, R. (ed.) Transcendental Arguments. Oxford University Press.
Cassirer, E. (1923), Substance and Function. Chicago: Open Court.
Cerbone, D. (2005), ‘Realism and Truth’, in Dreyfus, H. and Wrathall, M. (eds.) A Companion to Heidegger. Oxford: Blackwell.
Christensen, C. (1998), ‘Getting Heidegger Off the West Coast’, Inquiry, 41: 65–87.
Crane, T. (1992), ‘The Nonconceptual Content of Experience’, in Crane, T. (ed.) The Contents of Experience. Cambridge University Press.
Blattner, W. (2006), ‘Is There a Perceptual Relation?’, in Gendler, T. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.) Perceptual Experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Blattner, W. (2009), ‘Is Perception a Propositional Attitude?’, Philosophical Quarterly, 59: 452–69.
Blattner, W. (2011), ‘The Given’, in Schear, J. (ed.) Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell–Dreyfus Debate. Abingdon: Routledge.
Crowell, S. (2001), ‘Subjectivity: Locating the First-Person in Being and Time’, Inquiry, 44: 433–54.
Blattner, W. (2007a), ‘Conscience and Reason’, in Malpas, J. and Crowell, S. (eds.) Transcendental Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
Blattner, W. (2007b), ‘Sorge or Selbstbewußtsein? Heidegger and Korsgaard on the Sources of Normativity’, European Journal of Philosophy, 15: 315–33.
Crowell, S. (2008a), ‘Measure-Taking: Meaning and Normativity in Heidegger’s Philosophy’, Continental Philosophy Review, 41: 261–76.
Crowell, S. (2008b), ‘Phenomenological Immanence, Normativity, and Semantic Externalism’, Synthese, 160: 335–54.
Cussins, A. (2003), ‘Content, Conceptual Content, and Nonconceptual Content’, in Gunther, Y. H. (ed.) Essays on Nonconceptual Content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dahlstrom, D. (1994), ‘Heidegger’s Method: Philosophical Concepts as Formal Indications’, Review of Metaphysics, 47: 775–95.
Dahlstrom, D. (2001), Heidegger’s Concept of Truth. Cambridge University Press.
De Beistegui, M. (2002), ‘“Homo Prudens”’, in Raffoul, F. and Pettigrew, D. (eds.) Heidegger and Practical Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Dennis, P. (2012), ‘Was Heidegger a Nonconceptualist?’, Ratio, 25: 108–17.
Derrida, J. (1989), Of Spirit: Heidegger and the Question. University of Chicago Press.
Descartes, R. (1983), Oeuvres de Descartes, Tannery, P. and Adam, C. (eds.). Paris: Vrin.
Dreyfus, H. (1980), ‘Holism and Hermeneutics’, Review of Metaphysics, 34: 3–23.
Dreyfus, H. (1991), Being-in-the-World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dreyfus, H. (2000a), ‘The Primacy of Phenomenology over Logical Analysis’, Philosophical Topics, 27: 3–24.
Blattner, W. (2000b), ‘Replies’, in Wrathall, M. and Malpas, J. (eds.) Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blattner, W. (2005), ‘Overcoming the Myth of the Mental’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 79: 47–65.
Dreyfus, H. (2007a), ‘Response to McDowell’, Inquiry, 50: 371–7.
Dreyfus, H. (2007b), ‘The Return of the Myth of the Mental’, Inquiry, 50: 352–65.
Dreyfus, H. and Wrathall, M. A. (eds.) (2005), A Companion to Heidegger. Oxford: Blackwell.
Drummond, J. (1990), Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism: Noema and Object. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Blattner, W. (1992), ‘An Abstract Consideration: De-Ontologizing the Noema’, in Embree, L. and Drummond, J. (eds.) The Phenomenology of the Noema. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Evans, G. (1982), The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Faye, E. (2009), Heidegger: The Introduction of Nazism into Philosophy in Light of the Unpublished Seminars of 1933–1935. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
Fell, J. (1992), ‘The Familiar and the Strange: On the Limits of Praxis in Early Heidegger’, in Hall, H. and Dreyfus, H. (eds.) Heidegger: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Fodor, J. A. (1998), Concepts. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Føllesdal, D. (1969), ‘Husserl’s Notion of Noema’, Journal of Philosophy, 66: 680–7.
Frede, D. (1993), ‘The Question of Being: Heidegger’s Project’, in Guignon, C. B. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. Cambridge University Press.
Frege, G. (1906), ‘Über die Grundlagen der Geometrie 2’, Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereiningung, 15: 293–309, 377–403, 423–30.
Blattner, W. (1952), ‘On Concept and Object’, in Black, M. and Geach, P. (eds.) Translations from the Philosophical Writings. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blattner, W. (1953), The Foundations of Arithmetic. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blattner, W. (1967), ‘Begriffsschrift’, in Van Heijenoort, J. (ed.) From Frege to Gödel. London: Harvard University Press.
Geuss, R. (2005), Outside Ethics. Princeton University Press.
Ginet, C. (1975), Knowledge, Perception, and Memory. Dordrecht:Reidel.
Ginsborg, H. (2008), ‘Was Kant a Nonconceptualist?’, Philosophical Studies, 137: 65–77.
Golob, S. (2011), ‘Kant on Intentionality, Magnitude and the Unity of Perception’, European Journal of Philosophy, doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2011.00503.x.
Golob, S. (2013), ‘Heidegger on Kant, Time, and the “Form” of Intentionality’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 21: 345–67.
Blattner, W. (in press), ‘Hume, Kant and the Representational Role of the Imagination’, in Vermeir, K. (ed.) Knowledge and Imagination in Early Modern Philosophy. London: Springer.
Gonzalez, F. J. (2009), Plato and Heidegger: A Question of Dialogue. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Grzankowski, A. (in press), ‘Not All Attitudes Are Propositional’, European Journal of Philosophy.
Guignon, C. B. (2011), ‘Heidegger’s Concept of Freedom, 1927–30’, in Dahlstrom, D. (ed.) Interpreting Heidegger: Critical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
Guyer, P. (1987), Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.
Hanna, R. (2008), ‘Kantian Non-Conceptualism’, Philosophical Studies, 137: 41–64.
Han-Pile, B. (2005), ‘Early Heidegger’s Appropriation of Kant’, in Dreyfus, H. and Wrathall, M. (eds.) A Companion to Heidegger. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blattner, W. (2013), ‘Freedom and the Choice to Choose Oneself in Being and Time’, in Wrathall, M. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to ‘Being and Time’. Cambridge University Press.
Hatfield, G. (1990), The Natural and the Normative. London: MIT Press.
Heck, R. (2000), ‘Nonconceptual Content and the Space of Reasons’, Philosophical Review, 109: 483–523.
Hedley, D. (2008), Living Forms of the Imagination. London: T&T Clark.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1991), Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Cambridge University Press.
Hookway, C. (2002), ‘“… A Sort of Composite Photograph”: Pragmatism, Ideas, and Schematism’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 38: 29–45.
Husserl, E. (1984), Logische Untersuchungen. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Kelly, S. (2001), ‘The Non-Conceptual Content of Perceptual Experience’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61: 601–8.
Kelly, S. (2005), ‘Closing the Gap: Phenomenology and Logical Analysis’, Harvard Review of Philosophy, 13: 4–24.
Kisiel, T. (1993), The Genesis of Heidegger’s ‘Being and Time’. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Korsgaard, C. M. (1996), The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge University Press.
Lafont, C. (2000), Heidegger, Language, and World-Disclosure. Cambridge University Press.
Lafont, C. (2002a), ‘Précis ofHeidegger, Language and World-Disclosure’, Inquiry, 45: 185–9.
Lafont, C. (2002b), ‘Replies’, Inquiry, 45: 229–48.
Blattner, W. (2007), ‘Heidegger and the Synthetic a Priori’, in Malpas, J. and Crowell, S. (eds.) Transcendental Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
Longuenesse, B. (1998), Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Princeton University Press.
McDowell, J. (1984), ‘De ReSenses’, Philosophical Quarterly, 34: 283–94
McDowell, J. (1994), Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McDowell, J. (2007), ‘What Myth?’, Inquiry, 50: 338–51.
MacFarlane, J. (2002), ‘Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism’, Philosophical Review, 111: 25–65.
MacIntyre, A. C. (2007), After Virtue. University of Notre Dame Press.
McManus, D. (2012), Heidegger and the Measure of Truth: Themes from His Early Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
McNeill, W. (1999), The Glance of the Eye. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Martin, M. G. F. (2002), ‘The Transparency of Experience’, Mind and Language, 17: 376–425.
Martin, M. G. F. (2004), ‘The Limits of Self-Awareness’, Philosophical Studies, 120: 37–89.
Martin, W. (2013), ‘The Semantics of “Dasein” and the Modality of Being and Time’, in Wrathall, M. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to ‘Being and Time’. Cambridge University Press.
Montague, M. (2007), ‘Against Propositionalism’, Noûs, 41: 503–18.
Moran, D. (2000), ‘Heidegger’s Critique of Husserl’s and Brentano’s Accounts of Intentionality’, Inquiry, 43: 39–66.
Mulhall, S. (1994), ‘Wittgenstein and Heidegger: Orientations to the Ordinary’, European Journal of Philosophy, 2: 143–64.
Mulhall, S. (1996), Heidegger and ‘Being and Time’. London: Routledge.
Natorp, P. (1910), Die Logischen Grundlagen der Exakten Wissenschaften. Leipzig: Tübner.
Nietzsche, F. (1994), On the Genealogy of Morality. Cambridge University Press.
Okrent, M. (2007), ‘The “I Think” and the for-the-Sake-of-Which’, in Malpas, J. and Crowell, S. (eds.) Transcendental Heidegger. Stanford University Press.
Blattner, W. (2011), ‘Davidson, Heidegger and Truth’, in Malpas, J. (ed.) Dialogues with Davidson. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
O’Neill, O. (1989), Constructions of Reason. Cambridge University Press.
Peirce, C. S., Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P. (1998), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Bristol: Thoemmes.
Pinkard, T. (2010), ‘Freedom and the Lifeworld’, in Laitinen, A. and Sandis, C. (eds.) Hegel on Action. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pippin, R. (1999), ‘Naturalness and Mindedness: Hegel’s Compatibilism’, European Journal of Philosophy, 7: 194–212.
Pippin, R. (2002), ‘What Is the Question for Which Hegel’s Theory of Recognition Is the Answer?’, European Journal of Philosophy, 8: 155–72.
Pippin, R. (2008), Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge University Press.
Pippin, R. (2010), Hegel on Self-Consciousness: Desire and Death in the ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’. Princeton University Press.
Price, H. (2011), ‘Expressivism for Two Voices’, in Knowles, J. and Rydenfelt, H. (eds.) Pragmatism, Science and Naturalism. Berlin: Lang.
Price, H. and Macarthur, D. (2009), ‘Pragmatism, Quasi-Realism and the Global Challenge’, in Misak, C. (ed.) The New Pragmatists. Oxford University Press.
Ramsey, F. P. (1978), Foundations: Essays in Philosophy, Logic, Mathematics and Economics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Redding, P. (2010), ‘The Possibility of German Idealism after Analytic Philosophy’, in Reynolds, J. (ed.) Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. London: Continuum.
Richardson, J. (1986), Existential Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon.
Rosen, S. (2005), ‘Remarks on Heidegger’s Plato’, in Partenie, C. and Rockmore, T. (eds.) Heidegger and Plato: Toward Dialogue. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Rouse, J. (2013), ‘What Is Conceptually Articulated Understanding?’, in Schear, J. (ed.) Mind, Reason and Being-in-the-World. Abingdon: Routledge.
Russell, B. (1912), The Problems of Philosophy. OxfordUniversity Press.
Russell, B. (1937), A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz. London: Allen and Unwin.
Russell, B. (1986), The Philosophy of Logical Atomism and Other Essays. London: Allen and Unwin.
Russell, B. (1990), Philosophical Papers 1896–99. London: Unwin Hyman.
Russell, B. (2009), Our Knowledge of the External World. London: Routledge.
Schatzki, T. (2000), ‘Coping with Others with Folk Psychology’, in Wrathall, M. and Malpas, J. (eds.) Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schear, J. (2007), ‘Judgment and Ontology in Heidegger’s Phenomenology’, New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 7: 127–58.
Searle, J. (1983), Intentionality. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. (1992), The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blattner, W. (2000), ‘The Limits of Phenomenology’, in Wrathall, M. and Malpas, J. (eds.) Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science: Essays in Honor of Hubert L. Dreyfus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blattner, W. (2004), ‘The Phenomenological Illusion’, in Reicher, M. and Marek, J. (eds.) Experience and Analysis. Kirchberg am Wechsel: Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
Sheehan, T. (2005), ‘Dasein’, in Dreyfus, H. and Wrathall, M. (eds.) A Companion to Heidegger. Oxford: Blackwell.
Siegel, S. (2010), ‘Do Visual Experiences Have Contents?’, in Nanay, B. (ed.) Perceiving the World. Oxford University Press.
Smith, A. D. (2002), The Problem of Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smith, D. W. and McIntyre, R. (1982), Husserl and Intentionality. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Smith, W. H. (2007), ‘Why Tugendhat’s Critique of Heidegger’s Concept of Truth Remains a Critical Problem’, Inquiry, 50: 156–79.
Speaks, J. (2005), ‘Is There a Problem About Nonconceptual Content?’, Philosophical Review, 114: 359–98.
Stanley, J. (2011), Know How. Oxford University Press.
Stevens, G. (2005), The Russellian Origins of Analytic Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Strawson, P. F. (1966), The Bounds of Sense. London: Methuen.
Stroud, B. (1968), ‘Transcendental Arguments’, Journal of Philosophy, 65: 241–56.
Thomson, I. D. (2004), ‘Heidegger’s Perfectionist Philosophy of Education inBeing and Time’, Continental Philosophy Review, 37: 439–67.
Travis, C. (2004), ‘The Silence of the Senses’, Mind, 113: 57–94.
Tugendhat, E. (1986), Self-Consciousness and Self-Determination. London: MIT Press.
Blattner, W. (1994), ‘Heidegger’s Idea of Truth’, in Wachterhauser, B. R. (ed.) Hermeneutics and Truth. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Tye, M. (2009), ‘Representationalist Theories of Consciousness’, in McLaughlin, B., Beckerman, A. and Walter, S. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. Oxford University Press.
Van Cleve, J. (1999), Problems from Kant. Oxford University Press.
Vogel, L. (1994), The Fragile ‘We’. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Wood, A. W. (1998), ‘Kant’s Compatibilism’, in Kitcher, P. (ed.) Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’: Critical Essays. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
Wrathall, M. (1999), ‘Heidegger and Truth as Correspondence’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 7: 69–88.
Blattner, W. (2000), ‘Background Practices, Capacities and Heideggerian Disclosure’, in Wrathall, M. and Malpas, J. (eds.) Heidegger, Coping, and Cognitive Science. London: MIT Press.
Blattner, W. (2005), ‘Unconcealment’, in Dreyfus, H. and Wrathall, M. (eds.) A Companion to Heidegger. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blattner, W. (2006), ‘Truth and the Essence of Truth in Heidegger’s Thought’, in Guignon, C. B. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
Blattner, W. (2011), Heidegger and Unconcealment. Cambridge University Press.
Blattner, W. (2013), ‘Heidegger on Human Understanding’ in Wrathall, M. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger’s Being and Time. Cambridge University Press.
Young, J. M. (1992), ‘Thought and the Synthesis of Intuitions’, in Guyer, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press.
Young, J. (1997), Heidegger, Philosophy, Nazism. Cambridge University Press.
Zahavi, D. (2003), Husserl’s Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.
Zahavi, D. (2004), ‘Husserl’s Noema and the Internalism-Externalism Debate’, Inquiry, 47: 42–66.
Zuckert, R. (2007), ‘Projection and Purposiveness’, in Malpas, J. and Crowell, S. (eds.) Transcendental Heidegger. Stanford University Press.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.