Case Update : Judicial Review on 13th December 2022
UPDATE: HEARING POSTPONED TO 6/7 FEB 2023
SEE FULL DETAILS
The full-day Judicial Review Court Hearing will take place at The Royal Courts of Justice on Strand, London WC2A 2LL on Tuesday, 13th December.
The legal team have completed the preparation of the Exhibits, Statements and Reports and are now ready for the case to be heard.
The work on the Court bundles has been enormous,…
Case Update 11
Since the hearing on the 28th October 2021, we await the Court after the Appeal was submitted five days later on 2nd November and which was received by the Court on the following day. We will update you when we have further news. The wheels of justice turn slowly.
Please share this appeal as widely as possible to encourage others to contribute and thank you all for your valuable ongoing…
Case Update 10
With the support of you, and our legal team headed by Michael Mansfield QC, ‘We will not stop here’. We know the safety and future wellbeing of many people, including children and the vulnerable depends on us.
On October 28, 2021, a Renewal Notice seeking permission for a Judicial Review hearing, was turned down but we consider the reasoning for that decision to be flawed. The case advanced in…
Case Update 9
Pressing Forward :
We must report to you that our first application to judicially review the subject of ever-rising levels of radio frequency radiation and its potential harm to ourselves and the environment has been subject to a refusal by a judge. Without delay, the amazing Michael Mansfield QC, and barristers Philip Rule and Lorna Hackett, have swiftly lodged a Renewal Notice seeking…
Case Update 8
ACTION AGAINST 5G
JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCEEDINGS LODGED IN THE HIGH COURT
The Defendants are
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE
First Defendant
-and-
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT,
FOOD AND RURAL AFFAIRS
Second Defendant
-and-
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR DIGITAL CULTURE MEDIA AND SPORT
Third Defendant
The Claimants are represented by Michael Mansfield QC,…
Case Update 7
Our lawyers have asked the Government:
Why the Committee on Medical Aspects of Radiation in the Environment (COMARE) has decided not to review the available science and chosen instead to await a review by the WHO, the date of which is not known;
why PHE has chosen to ignore the compelling evidence that RFR and 5G are harmful which we submitted to them, from UK and abroad;
why…
Case Update 6
Statement from the legal team.
In the process of preparing this case, we needed to investigate certain matters during which alarming and dramatic further evidence has come to light. This new information has had to be properly considered and methodically put into a proper format in consultation with several experts, which has taken substantial time and effort.
We have qualitatively…
Case Update
We have now written to the Government’s lawyers with information which we assert provides significant evidence that the roll out of 5G, on top of existing levels of RFR, is already causing physical harm.
We have provided the Government with case-specific scientific and medical evidence to support our claim, and have gathered witness testimony from people who have suffered serious…
The Work Continues
The work continues: strategy and planning achieved and what happens next.
The recent result in the US (see previous post) lends considerable support for the defendants in the High Court in this jurisdiction to consider the evidence and properly assess the risks relating to the increasing levels of RFR, most recently 5G.
As you will have seen from our earlier case update, our request…
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions The proposed defendants in the case as given in the Letter Before Action are:
Public Health England, Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Secretary of
State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, and the Secretary of State for
Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.
We seek a judicial review.
A judicial review is a means of challenging the…