Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CityJSON #114

Open
tidoust opened this issue Mar 6, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

CityJSON #114

tidoust opened this issue Mar 6, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
Geospatial Topics under discussion in the Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group

Comments

@tidoust
Copy link
Member

tidoust commented Mar 6, 2018

CityJSON is a format for encoding a subset of the CityGML data model, an OGC standard, using JSON. A CityJSON file represents both the geometry and the semantics of the city features of a given area, e.g. buildings, roads, rivers, the vegetation, and the city furniture.

The proposal is driven by Hugo Ledoux (@hugoledoux), working at Delft University of Technology.

See:

@tidoust tidoust added the Geospatial Topics under discussion in the Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group label Mar 6, 2018
@tidoust tidoust self-assigned this Mar 6, 2018
@tidoust tidoust moved this from Investigation to Incubation in Strategy Team's Incubation Pipeline (Funnel) Mar 6, 2018
@tidoust
Copy link
Member Author

tidoust commented Mar 14, 2018

For reference, CityJSON update, 9 March 2018

@hugoledoux
Copy link

Progress

  • the discussions we had during the Fort Collins meeting about the links to CityGML-SWG (ie having implementation + code part of the standard, and not just the abstract data model; offering profiles in the future; key concepts in draft CityGML v3 that would make the implementation of the data model very complex, etc.) triggered some discussions in that group, to say the least. The CityGML-SWG is going through an "examination of conscience" this summer, which will have impacts on what CityJSON will be in the future. Right now the chairs of the SWG are designing a plan, and I am eagerly waiting to see what that plan contains. Thus, I can't say much at this point.

  • working on CityJSON v0.7:

    1. better metadata for 3D data (based on a subset of ISO19115) are being added
    2. CityJSON has a draft proposal for Extensions (known as ADEs in CityGML). http://www.cityjson.org/en/latest/extensions/
  • improved the python software cjio to process CityJSON files.

Next steps

@hugoledoux
Copy link

hugoledoux commented Oct 22, 2018

Progress

Next steps

@tidoust
Copy link
Member Author

tidoust commented Jun 24, 2019

The Spatial Data on the Web IG resolved to move the issue to the parking lot given the lack of immediate standardization plans for CityJSON.

@tidoust tidoust moved this from Incubation to Parking Lot in Strategy Team's Incubation Pipeline (Funnel) Jun 24, 2019
@akuckartz
Copy link

CityJSON should be based in JSON-LD.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Geospatial Topics under discussion in the Spatial Data on the Web Interest Group
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants