UK records 16,578 more cases of coronavirus and 533 deaths as fatalities continue to decline in the wake of England's second lockdown
- Department of Health figures show the number of cases rose by 2.5 per cent compared to last Wednesday
- Deaths, however, fell by 17 per cent compared to last week after 533 were recorded by health chiefs
- Covid-19 cases in Briton have been plateauing since England's national lockdown was lifted on December 2
Britain's daily Covid-19 cases appear to be plateauing a week after England's second national lockdown ended, official statistics revealed today as health chiefs recorded another 16,578 infections.
Today's figures are a 2.5 per cent rise on the Government's positive tally from last Wednesday, when officials added another 16,170 cases to the total.
Deaths from the virus fell by 17.7 per cent compared to last week, after 533 victims were posted on the dashboard compared to 648 seven days ago.
Department of Health figures showed cases plummeted during the first two weeks of England's second shutdown. But the curve began to flatten a week before the draconian measures were lifted, suggesting Britons may have grown tired of the restrictions on their daily lives.
The cases come after the UK's world-first Covid-19 vaccine rollout ran into problems within 24 hours when two NHS staff suffered an allergic reaction after receiving Pfizer's jab.
The British medicines regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), has told anyone with a history of allergies not to get the vaccine while it investigates the cases.
The number of people set to be barred is not known, but up to 7million Britons suffer from allergies that are so severe they require medical attention, according to the NHS.
The two staff members, who have not been named, are said to be recovering well. They suffered an anaphylactoid reaction to the vaccine, which is milder than anaphylaxis, and tends to involve a rash, shortness of breath, swelling of the face and tongue or a drop in blood pressure, the NHS says.
Professor Chris Whitty, Britain's chief medical officer, warned today that despite the vaccine roll out lockdowns would still be needed until March because it will take time to give the vaccine to enough people.
The jab is being rolled out at 50 hospital sites to the elderly, care home residents and NHS workers first - who are most vulnerable to the virus - before it is offered to the rest of the population.
But scientists say at least 60 per cent of Britons will need to get the jab - or 40million people - before the Government can start to relax restrictions without triggering a sudden surge in infections.
Both are recovering following the first day of the mass vaccination programme, it is understood (pictured, the vaccine being administered in Glasgow yesterday)
In other coronavirus news:
- A cyberattack has hit the EU's medicines agency, prompting fears vaccine data may have been stolen;
- Sir Patrick Vallance admits there is 'no hard evidence' 10pm pub curfews slow the spread of infection;
- Wales urges residents not to spend Christmas with their families despite a UK-wide relaxation of the rules;
- Tubes will not run overnight on New Year's Eve to put a stop to partying revellers;
- London MP issues last minute plea to Londoners to keep following the rules as the Government prepares to decide whether to put the capital into Tier Three;
- European politicians snipe at Britain's vaccine success, with Belgian PM gloating it was 'made on the continent';
- Oxford university today insisted it was not a mistake to give a half dose to volunteers in its trials following criticism;
- Coronavirus was identified in Italian boy in November 2019, study finds in latest evidence China hid the truth from the world.
The number of daily Covid-19 infections reported has plateaued after reaching a low of 14,400 a day on average on December 5, three days after England's lockdown ended.
The average number of cases has since risen to 15,367, meaning the UK has an infection rate at 161 cases per 100,0000 people.
Professor Stephen Powis, national medical director for the NHS in England, announced today that those with a history of allergic reactions should not get Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine.
He said: 'The MHRA have advised on a precautionary basis that people with a significant history of allergic reactions do not receive this vaccination after two people with a history of significant allergic reactions responded adversely yesterday. Both are recovering well.'
Despite the two allergy cases the Government is today continuing to vaccinate between 5,000 and 7,000 people per day across the UK with 800,000 Pfizer doses already in hospitals and millions more on the way.
In the US vaccine trial carried out by Pfizer, 137 out of around 19,000 people given the vaccine had one or more of these reactions. But 111 who got the placebo also had allergic reactions.
Reactions to the jab can include a temperature, nausea, swelling of the arm or in severe cases feeling generally unwell with swollen lymph node glands.
A Pfizer spokesman said: 'We have been advised by MHRA of two yellow card reports that may be associated with allergic reaction due to administration of the COVID-19 BNT162b2 vaccine.
'As a precautionary measure, the MHRA has issued temporary guidance to the NHS while it conducts an investigation in order to fully understand each case and its causes. Pfizer and BioNTech are supporting the MHRA in the investigation.
'In the pivotal phase 3 clinical trial, this vaccine was generally well tolerated with no serious safety concerns reported by the independent Data Monitoring Committee. The trial has enrolled over 44,000 participants to date, over 42,000 of whom have received a second vaccination'.
Dr June Raine, the chief executive of the MHRA, told the Science Committee today there had been two allergic reactions to the Pfizer vaccine yesterday.
She said: 'I may share with the committees that even last evening we were looking at two case reports of allergic reactions.
'We know from the very extensive clinical trials that this wasn't a feature, but if we need to strengthen our advice now that we've had this experience in the vulnerable populations - the groups who've been selected as a priority - we get that advice to the field immediately.'
Dr Raine said careful plans had been made for 'real-time vigilance' when monitoring side effects from vaccinations and that any updates to advice for patients would be communicated 'immediately'.
She told the Committee regulators had been aware since last night of the two people who had experienced the reactions.
The numbers in the capital are moving in the wrong direction, with cases per person up by half in the worst affected corners of the city and chaotic photos from the weekend showing shopping streets packed with people. Red shows areas where the infection rate has risen in a week, while green shows the boroughs that have seen a fall in cases
She said: 'The role is before, during and after, and there is a true end-to-end looking from the scientific laboratory bench through to the patient who yesterday first received the vaccine.
'As an illustration to this, I may share with the committee that even last evening we were looking at two case reports of allergic reaction.
'We know from the very extensive clinical trials that this wasn't a feature but if we need to strengthen our advice now that we have had this experience in the vulnerable populations... we will get that advice to the field immediately.'
The MHRA advice states: 'Any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food (such as previous history of anaphylactoid reaction or those who have been advised to carry an adrenaline autoinjector) should not receive the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine.
'Resuscitation facilities should be available at all times for all vaccinations. Vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available.'
The yellow card scheme is the UK system for collecting and monitoring information on suspected safety concerns or incidents involving medicines and medical devices.
Commenting on the development, Peter Openshaw, past-president of the British Society for Immunology and professor of experimental medicine at Imperial College London, said: 'As with all food and medications, there is a very small chance of an allergic reaction to any vaccine.
'However, it is important that we put this risk in perspective. The occurrence of any allergic reaction was one of the factors monitored in the phase three clinical trial of this Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine, the detailed data from which was released yesterday.
'In this, they reported a very small number of allergic reactions in both the vaccine and placebo groups (0.63% and 0.51%).
'Similar to the rollout of all new vaccines and medications, this new Covid-19 vaccine is being monitored closely by the MHRA.
'They will now investigate these cases in more detail to understand if the allergic reactions were linked to the vaccine or were incidental.
'The fact that we know so soon about these two allergic reactions and that the regulator has acted on this to issue precautionary advice shows that this monitoring system is working well.'
Professor Ian Jones, a virologist at the University of Reading, told MailOnline he was 'surprised' by the warning and said he would be cautious about attributing this to an allergic reaction.
'I think it's probably safer in my view than many other vaccines currently available,' he told MailOnline. 'It really is very clean technology.'
'I would be cautious about attributing the allergic reactions to the vaccine at this moment, especially as it hasn't cropped up in clinical trials,' he said.
'The big allergic reaction to vaccines normally is an egg allergy, because historically influenza vaccines and several others have been grown in hens eggs and you inevitably get a bit of egg protein coming through with the final product.
'But there's nothing like that in the mRNA vaccine. The only addition is the lipid coating that they put on the mRNA before it goes into cells – but there's no history of allergic reactions to that.'
Britain will remain in some form of lockdown until at least March despite the roll out of coronavirus vaccines, Professor Chris Whitty has warned
Despite the vaccine roll out Professor Chris Whitty has warned the UK could still be at risk of lockdowns until March next year because not enough people will have been vaccinated.
As many as 5,000 to 7,000 Britons get the jab every day in 10-minute appointments, and thousands more will start receiving it in 'vaccine hubs' in the new year. But scientists say not enough people will have received the protection to allow the Government to start relaxing restrictions until spring at the earliest.
Professor Whitty told the Commons Health and Science Committee today: 'For the next three months, I want to be very clear, we will not have sufficient protection.
'We're going through the most difficult time of year for respiratory infections and the most difficult time of year for the NHS.
'So the idea we can suddenly stop now because the vaccine is here, that would be really premature.
'It would be like someone giving up a marathon race at mile 16 – it would be absolutely the wrong thing to do.'
He added, however, that the UK should have three or four vaccines against Covid-19 by mid-20212, raising hopes of returning to pre-pandemic normality by the summer.
Professor Whitty said around 20 million people are in the first phase of the NHS vaccination programme, including all those over the age of 50, plus healthcare workers, care home staff and elderly people.
He told MPs he expects to have a 'portfolio' of several vaccines by the middle of 2021, but advised that the rollout process should still proceed 'carefully'.
He said: 'The aim would be to roll out this vaccine and any others that get a licence and are effective and safe.
'We expect, probably by the middle of the year, to have a portfolio of three or four vaccines which we can actually use.'
In other news, Wales urged its residents not to spend Christmas with their families or risk 'higher deaths and hospitalisations in January' despite signing up to the UK-wide festive pause in measures.
Wales' First Minister Mark Drakeford said the situation in the country is 'incredibly serious' as top scientific advisers warned against socialising in the festive period.
The devolved government may have to bring in tougher pre-Christmas rules if cases don't come under control soon, they said, and the NHS will have to think hard about whether it needs to stop some services to make space for Covid-19 patients.
Wales will be part of the UK's planned relaxation of social distancing between December 23 and 27, which will allow households to meet in bubbles.
Wales' First Minister Mark Drakeford (left) said the situation in the country is 'incredibly serious' as his top scientific advisers warned against socialising in the festive period. SAGE expert Professor Susan Michie (right) has urged Number 10 to back down on its Christmas lockdown loosening plans for similar concerns
Official data shows Wales' infection rate rose from 181 per 100,000 on November 16 to nearly 300 on December 3
But scientists on the Welsh Government's Technical Advisory Group (TAG) sent out the stark warning that it is 'likely to lead to higher deaths and hospitalisations after Christmas'.
Its most recent report says: 'If people can avoid seeing others over the Christmas period, perhaps postponing celebrations until later next year or meeting remotely, then this is strongly advised.'
If people are dead set on seeing family over Christmas then they should consider 'pre-isolating', according to the groups. This would involve avoiding others they don't live with for the virus's 10-day incubation period.
The precautionary measure 'would likely be an effective way of lowering your risk of infecting others', according to TAG.
Official data shows Wales' infection rate rose from 181 per 100,000 on November 16 to nearly 300 on December 3.
SAGE's Professor Susan Michie, an expert in health psychology at University College London, urged ministers to 'reset' advice over Christmas after warning that the UK faced the prospect of a 'really bad' third wave of coronavirus infections.
She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'While I think people sometimes push the boundaries, if the leadership and the message is coming from many different (sources) - and especially if it is coming from trusted sources - that we really need to be careful this Christmas, and as much as possible see people outside or use online platforms, think of creative different ways (to see each other) - drinks with neighbours on the street, more local community rather than travelling miles across the country - then I think people would have really (listened).
'I still think it is not too late, because transmission rates are going up, we are facing the potential of a really bad third wave come January and February unless we really take steps now to prevent that.
'I think a bit of a reorientation, a bit of a reset on how people are thinking about Christmas, would be really good.
'I know it would be tough, tough for a lot of people, but it is much better than losing loved ones.'
Most watched News videos
- Dramatic moment police arrest man after shooting partner in the head
- Suspect clings to moving car during police chase before being shot
- Terrifying moment driver overtakes van and narrowly avoids crash
- Moscow terror suspect screams as he is captured by Russian forces
- Moments after Baltimore bridge struck by a container vessel
- Dramatic moment police arrest man after shooting partner in the head
- British man fighting for Putin posts video from Russia online
- Sally Nugent hilariously finds out 'hedgehog' is a hat bobble
- Hilarious moment King's Guard shout 'make way' at pigeons in London
- King Charles seen near Windsor Castle as he is driven to London
- Moment children scream during crush at school gate in Bristol
- Tourist is filmed napping in his tent on the beach with a crocodile
Watched lunchtime news on bbc today London's R rat...
by Anonymous 694